|
|
Post by Lemmy Campbell on Apr 18, 2006 21:07:01 GMT 10
So for the guy who don't know what is going on I ad going to explain. In an interview a reporter asked Batista what he think about TNA. His answer was that he had never watch TNA showq but he think TNA sucks. And the wrestlers there are no good and the matches are "car crash".
After that Joe spuit something on his site, but nothing too seriouse. Quote: "Dave Batista... Ehh its not even worth it, I hope your opinion of others made you feel better about yourself."
But AJ responde very kindly in another interview. His words was something like: "And what should I do to be a good wrestler? To bundle in with steroids? Hey Batista I can make powerbomb too.
(Here was the old news)
And now after couple of mounths nothing happening another started again with another interview and AJ respond as kindly as he can.
So guys what you think?
|
|
|
|
Post by Jonny Stripes on Apr 19, 2006 1:01:41 GMT 10
This is awesome, exactly the sort of the thing that needs to keep happening, rivalry between them, then Vince can do awesome in the ratings, destroy TNA and give AJ the "Booker Treatment"...ahahaha
|
|
Pyro
Level 7
Living legend!
Posts: 235
|
Post by Pyro on Apr 19, 2006 16:39:08 GMT 10
WWE are going down! ;D They don't stand the chance... I won't argue with you on this but we will talk again in 10 years time when WWE will be out of the business and ROH will be the best wrestling promotion in America!  |
|
|
|
Post by Jonny Stripes on Apr 19, 2006 16:59:33 GMT 10
Ahahaha, ROH? C'mon man, hell will freeze over before they are the best promotion in America! Also, what do you mean by best, cos that can't really be measured. Maybe biggest, but not best
|
|
Pyro
Level 7
Living legend!
Posts: 235
|
Post by Pyro on Apr 19, 2006 17:19:28 GMT 10
Well they are already the best when it comes to quality. They only need a couple of big stars and they'll have them in 5-6 years when WWE goes bust. Then ROH will slowly improve and gather more audience and in the end they will be the No.1 promotion in North America and TNA the second! |
|
|
|
Post by Jonny Stripes on Apr 19, 2006 17:34:33 GMT 10
Thats all speculation and immeasurable claims
There is no possible proper way to say ROH are the best, because quality in this case is not measurable. You can measure the quality of water, but not of a wrestling promotion
You can say that Swiss chocolate is the best in the world, but there is no way to measure this claim, so therefore it remains an opinion, not fact. In this case you saying that ROH are the best is not fact either, because it is not measurable
And saying WWE will go bust in 5-6 years, peeeeerleeeeazzzzzzzzzzzzz. Do you have any financial evidence to substantiate such a rash claim?
|
|
|
|
Post by Matt Hare on Apr 19, 2006 18:09:42 GMT 10
TNA>WWE
WWE>RoH
RoH>CZW
CZW>PCW (Australia)
There's my rant.
|
|
Pyro
Level 7
Living legend!
Posts: 235
|
Post by Pyro on Apr 20, 2006 3:13:49 GMT 10
I'm not really going to argue over this but we will see what will hapen in a couple of years when WWE start losing money... And as for ROH... It is easy for me to determine which promotion is better. All I have to do is to compare the quality of the wrestling coz no matter if the storylines are good or bad the quality of the matches is the most important and in the moment in North America ROH has the best matches when it comes to quality (their storylines are also great but this is more of a personal opinion). When they get a couple of big stars and draw some attention to themselves you'll see what is going to happen! |
|
|
|
Post by Jonny Stripes on Apr 20, 2006 12:21:03 GMT 10
No, we won't argue forever about his but all I can say is that its your personal opinion, thats all
|
|
|
|
Post by nicho on Apr 21, 2006 1:07:06 GMT 10
mmm, TNA are good, and getting better, but like i said, it wont ever 'defeat' wwe!
this is so much the same as the WWE/WCW days, who won that?, and trust me, TNBA arnt even as near as popular as wat wcw were
but personaly, i hope TNA challange wwe.. cos then it wil bring the best out of wwe, and we will see who has the real talent!
dont forget, TNA are giving everything they got, WWE are really lazy, and if they put the footy down, watch out TNA!
i do like WWE better, but i am a fan on TNA (i only watch 1 PPV a month)... but thats just my opinion!
|
|
|
|
Post by Nightmare on Apr 21, 2006 2:02:23 GMT 10
Even with TNA getting old past WWE/WCW Superstars like Sting, Scott Stiener and possibly Goldberg, doesnt mean they have a chance against the WWE, exactly how WCW did, getting EX WWE superstars like Hogan, Nash, Hall, 2001 was the end of WCW, and when Vince buys out TNA, it will be the end of T...N...A Best thing for the WWE to do is to end the brand extension, fire some useless superstars, and have main eventers like HHH, HBK, Taker, Edge, Batista, Angle ;D |
|
|
|
Post by Lemmy Campbell on Apr 21, 2006 21:31:23 GMT 10
Batista is over pushed monkey! From the new guys I can't stand only him. Ha can't use the mic, he can't take bumps, he can't do anything right and his in ring skills are very poor. I will be a better wrestler now, when I haven't been to wrestling school. And by the way WWE if it is like it was when was feuding with WCW would of been gold mine. Now there are poor storylines most of them are not worty to watch them. I can't watch the moorons from WWE making Randy to laugh at Eddie! He done much for the wrestling (not only in WWE) and they make a fun out of him. Plus now it is becoming moreand more unstable. The things inside are not looking good. The problems and all...... If you see the rating of SNME you will see it is the lowest from them all. The lowest rating EVER! That makes you rthink about it don't you? |
|
